Execution Scenarios: Introduction
This section presents a series of execution-scenario articles that examine CryptoLegacy from multiple perspectives.
Each chapter explores a specific condition under owner inability to act β including privacy under pressure, security failures, long-term flexibility, automation without coordination, reliability, legal uncertainty, and cost. Together, they show how the same underlying execution model behaves as real-world assumptions break down.
These are not separate features or isolated solutions. They are different views of a single execution system designed for situations where the owner cannot act on-chain.
Rather than describing what CryptoLegacy can do, these articles explain:
why the model exists,
which failure cases it addresses, and
how predefined on-chain rules behave when human coordination, availability, or legal certainty fails.
Taken together, the section forms a coherent narrative about self-custody beyond key management β focused on execution, limits, and continuity over time.
Want to go deeper?
If youβre looking for protocol-level mechanics, you can skip directly to the detailed documentation.
Or ask CryptoLegacy AI β our custom GPT β to explain how the protocol works, without marketing or oversimplification.
Last updated